Hi!
marc fleury wrote:
> compared to what RMH and I had written I find the current method lookup for
> invocation
>
> 1- ugly!
Why is it ugly?
> 2- buggy
What is buggy?
> 3- fast?
Yes, since the lookup is O(1). What is the alternative?
> Ok rickard, don't get all locked up... what is the reason behind the 2 maps
> one in invoker/container.
One maps the remote MI to EJB invocations, and one maps EJB invocations
to bean methods. Two different maps.
> Is the only reason for this structure the "speed" because if it is it seems
> to me we have other issues... <grin>
What is the other issue? (Call me!)
> In any case the real case is can we unify the 2 maps? ( JRMPContainerInvoker
> and Container)...
No, they have different purposes. Why do you want to unify them? What is
the issue?
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com
