marc fleury wrote:
> > We know which protocol each client in the chain uses.  Why can't
> > we substitute the correct EJBObject (based on the protocol) at
> > each stage?  For instance, we know that session A uses protocol
> 
> That is correct and the simple way to pass it as outlined is the MI that
> carries a reference to the CI so that the getEJBObject() from the context
> delegates to a getEJBObject wrapper at some point to the CI.

See other post. EJBObject translation is non-trivial. Sorry.

/Rickard

-- 
Rickard �berg

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com

Reply via email to