"Patrick J. McNerthney" wrote :
> Sebastien,
> Could this have something to do with the manifest entry?
> I know that I have had similar problems that went away when would
> extract everything from a jar file and rejar it without manifest
> generation.
EXCELLENT, Thanks it solves the problem....
Would you mind to explain me what was going wrong with the manifest file
? Indeed it's a third party library, so I had to extract and rejar with
the M option. For the moment it's OK, but I'm afraid that other people
will fall in the same trap.
So how can we avoid this ? Should we tell Sun about it ?
Thanks,
Sebastien who is impressed by the reactivity of OpenSource community !
> Pat McNerthney
> Icicle Software, Inc.
> Sebastien Sahuc wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I don't know if it was done yet, but I finally succeeded in integrating
> > Catalina in jboss.
> >
> > It wasn't a piece of cake, since it generates core dumps on my win JDK1.3
> > JVM.
> > I was getting EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION from all the place, and when I
> > forced to NON JIT, the error was a 'little' more explicit : '
> > java.util.MissingResourceException can't find bundle for base name
> > org.apache.catalina.valves.LocalStrings'
> > whereas the resource was in the catalina.jar !!!!
> >
> > So I traced down the ResourceBundle which took me way too long... in
> > java.util.ResourceBundle I had to trace an exception that was caucht but
> > simply ignored :-( (line 944)
> > Finally the original exception is :
> > java.io.IOException: Bad file descriptor
> >
> > Does anyone know what this mean ? Is there some limit in these file
> > decriptors ?
> >
> > Is it a JVM bug (because with JDK1.2.2 win it does work) ?
> >
> > So to make everything working, I had to extract from the catalina.jar the
> > necessary LocalStrings.properties (there is 10 of them) into a classes
> > directory, and after reshaping the classpath, everything worked fine. Any
> > idea on what's happening ?
> >
> > So beside this issue, I'm willing to share with the other my
> > 'CatalinaMBean', and the guideline (way similar to Tomcat3.x). Thus I'm
> > expecting directive from the board :-)
> >
> > All the best,
> >
> > Sebastien
