User: juha
Date: 00/09/30 00:38:44
Modified: src/main/org/jboss/verifier/strategy EJBVerifier11.java
Log:
Commented out two events that were misleadingly complaining
about illegal RMI-IIOP value types for primary keys.
Revision Changes Path
1.18 +11 -6 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/verifier/strategy/EJBVerifier11.java
Index: EJBVerifier11.java
===================================================================
RCS file:
/products/cvs/ejboss/jboss/src/main/org/jboss/verifier/strategy/EJBVerifier11.java,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -r1.17 -r1.18
--- EJBVerifier11.java 2000/09/25 17:43:27 1.17
+++ EJBVerifier11.java 2000/09/30 07:38:43 1.18
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
*
* This package and its source code is available at www.jboss.org
- * $Id: EJBVerifier11.java,v 1.17 2000/09/25 17:43:27 juha Exp $
+ * $Id: EJBVerifier11.java,v 1.18 2000/09/30 07:38:43 juha Exp $
*/
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
* @author Juha Lindfors ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* @author Aaron Mulder ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
*
- * @version $Revision: 1.17 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.18 $
* @since JDK 1.3
*/
public class EJBVerifier11 extends AbstractVerifier {
@@ -1414,11 +1414,16 @@
}
} catch(NullPointerException e) {} // That's OK - the
implementor expected the fields to have values
} catch(IllegalAccessException e) {
- fireSpecViolationEvent(entity, new Section("9.2.9.a"));
- status = false;
+ // [FIXME] The two error messages below are incorrect.
+ // The RMI-IDL language mapping does not require
+ // the value types to have a no args constructor.
+ // [JPL]
+ //
+ //fireSpecViolationEvent(entity, new Section("9.2.9.a"));
+ //status = false;
} catch(InstantiationException e) {
- fireSpecViolationEvent(entity, new Section("9.2.9.a"));
- status = false;
+ //fireSpecViolationEvent(entity, new Section("9.2.9.a"));
+ //status = false;
}
}
} catch(ClassNotFoundException e) {
