Dan OConnor wrote:
DO> On 10 Oct 00, at 20:58, Oleg Nitz wrote:
>> For password validation - yes, for realm mapping - no, we've got more
>> complicated structure.
DO> As a side note, I would make the case that jBoss should have
DO> realm mapping that allows for groups, and groups within groups,
DO> etc. Do you have an even more complicated structure? Is it
DO> confidential, or can you share it as an example of what might be
DO> required?
ROLE table has one-to-many relation to itself, as you described,
USER table has many-to-many relation to ROLE table, via auxiliary
table USER_ROLE.
I am grateful to you for the great discussion (I guess, it's over),
for good questions that have helped me to clean the scheme
and for your tolerance.
It's time to go coding :-)
Best regards,
Oleg
