On 11 Oct 00, at 13:00, Daniel Schulze wrote: > Two possible ways to solve it: > 1. bring the transaction stuff into the jaws code and use two > transactions for this operation (reuse the old code) > There is nothing wrong with this, in my opinion. In general, persistence code needs to be able to have some control over the transactional context in which it accesses a resouce (e.g. for optimistic concurrency). -Dan
- [jBoss-Dev] CVS update:jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/... jBoss CVS Development
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] CVS update:jboss/src/main/org/j... Aaron Mulder
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] CVS update:jboss/src/main/o... Daniel Schulze
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] CVS update:jboss/src/ma... Aaron Mulder
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] CVS update:jboss/sr... Daniel Schulze
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] CVS update:jbo... Aaron Mulder
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] CVS update... Daniel Schulze
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] CVSupdate:jbos... marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] CVS update:jboss/src/ma... Dan OConnor
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] CVS update:jboss/sr... Daniel Schulze
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] CVSupdate:jboss/src/mai... marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] CVSupdate:jboss/src/main/or... marc fleury
- [jBoss-Dev] CVS update:jboss/src/main/org/jboss... jBoss CVS Development
- [jBoss-Dev] CVS update:jboss/src/main/org/jboss... jBoss CVS Development
- [jBoss-Dev] CVS update:jboss/src/main/org/jboss... jBoss CVS Development
