yeah that is good enough for now, again we will need to move to the
clustered naming at some point.
marc


|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of jBoss CVS
|Development
|Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 11:02 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [jBoss-Dev] CVS update:
|jboss/src/main/org/jboss/jmx/clientRMIClientConnectorImpl.java
|
|
|  User: andreas
|  Date: 00/10/10 23:01:43
|
|  Modified:    src/main/org/jboss/jmx/client RMIClientConnectorImpl.java
|  Log:
|  Uses the new JNDI name pattern:
|  jmx:<Host Name>:<Protocol Name>
|  to lookup it server-side counterpart.
|
|  Revision  Changes    Path
|  1.3       +1 -1
|jboss/src/main/org/jboss/jmx/client/RMIClientConnectorImpl.java
|
|  Index: RMIClientConnectorImpl.java
|  ===================================================================
|  RCS file:
|/products/cvs/ejboss/jboss/src/main/org/jboss/jmx/client/RMIClientC
|onnectorImpl.java,v
|  retrieving revision 1.2
|  retrieving revision 1.3
|  diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
|  --- RMIClientConnectorImpl.java      2000/09/11 03:22:03     1.2
|  +++ RMIClientConnectorImpl.java      2000/10/11 06:01:43     1.3
|  @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
|                               ", name in namespace: " +
|lNamingContext.getNameInNamespace()
|                       );
|                       // This has to be adjusted later on to
|reflect the given parameter
|  -                    mRemoteConnector = (RMIConnector) new
|InitialContext().lookup( "jmx:rmi" );
|  +                    mRemoteConnector = (RMIConnector) new
|InitialContext().lookup( "jmx:" + pServer + ":rmi" );
|
tem.err.println( 
|"RMIClientConnectorImpl.start(), got remote connector: " + 
|mRemoteConnector );
|                       mServer = pServer;
|               }
|  
|  
|  
|
|


Reply via email to