1- relax, it's normal
2- relax
3- put the NoPassivation caches as standard (the ones you wrote, we have no
choice)
marc
|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bordet, Simone
|Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 2:18 PM
|To: 'jBoss Developer'
|Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] JNDI Problem
|
|
|Hey Marc,
|
|> well, frankly don't abuse the trust I put in you guys by
|> handing out the rw
|> passwd.
|>
|> We are a unique group in the sense that there are alot of
|> independent rw
|> passwd, I don't want to see abuses, and I haven't seen any so far.
|>
|> I don't even consider yours an abuse... the fact that the new
|> caches don't
|> really work well (don't scale for now, but we are looking at
|> it)
|
|What's the problem ? May you be more explicit ? May I help on this ?
|
|> is beyond the point.
|>
|> It seems to me that the LRU passivating is more complex than the no
|> passivation (and throws NPEs, sebastien is on it).
|
|NPEs ? Ouch, never saw them, which means I never tested it so deeply as
|you're doing. It seems that you have a quite big hammer :-)) As
|above, may I
|help ?
|
|> At least
|> I want the
|> NoPassivation to be the default in CVS for now. I don't
|> think we can really
|> go out with this guys quite yet.
|
|So, how do we organize, given also my last post ?
|
|Best Regards,
|
|Simon
|
|
