Hey Rickard,
> > > and just lock on the context since at least it seems
> > > that it does
> > > release locks on the object it has.
> > > ideas? (btw the test code is in jbosstest and is called
> "locktest"
> >
> > I'd suggest to use the instance cache object also for wait
> and notifyAll
> > instead of the context. Since the logic for wait and
> notifyAll is in the
> > int'rs and they all can access the container, they all can
> access the
> > instance cache.
>
> Works but would be too slow. Too many threads waking up to
> see "oh, it was
> not for me". Nah, the semaphore stuff I submitted should work better.
You're right, as usual !
I implemented the solution you suggested and it works smoothly :-))
Marc, Sebastien, any result / comment from you ?
BTW, I've also implemented the EJX part for the new caches, and I'm ready to
commit it. With this it comes also the standardjboss.xml where I put as
standard cache policy the NoPassivationCachePolicy. Is this OK for you ?
Regards,
Simon
