"Bordet, Simone" wrote:
>
> Well, at the end I figured it out...
>
> Rickard posted its solution and I implemented it;
> Rickard restored the throw new RemoteException("Reentrant call") (and so I
> did) that is now remarked (around line 185 in EntityInstanceInterceptor).
> This led to the break of my 11-th test, 'cause when I remarked it locktest
> run fine.
> This part of code is entered because the tx associated with the context is
> null.
>
> Soo, as it is now in CVS (not spec compliant, but works) + Rickard's
> solution works <happy>fine</happy>.
>
> Bye
>
> Simon
Ok, it works for the default settings.
Now try the big hammer: sh locktest.sh threads=50 iterations=10
More work needed :(
Sebastien
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bordet, Simone
> > Sent: gioved� 19 ottobre 2000 16:27
> > To: 'jBoss Developer'
> > Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] Release lock bug in JDK? Fixed ? :-(
> >
> >
> > Baahhh,
> >
> > too early. I run 10 test successfully and I said "it works",
> > guess what
> > happened to the 11-th test ?
> >
> > Simon
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bordet, Simone
> > > Sent: gioved� 19 ottobre 2000 15:58
> > > To: 'jBoss Developer'
> > > Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] Release lock bug in JDK? Fixed ! :-)
> > >
> > >
> > > Hey Rickard,
> > >
> > > > > > and just lock on the context since at least it seems
> > > > > > that it does
> > > > > > release locks on the object it has.
> > > > > > ideas? (btw the test code is in jbosstest and is called
> > > > "locktest"
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd suggest to use the instance cache object also for wait
> > > > and notifyAll
> > > > > instead of the context. Since the logic for wait and
> > > > notifyAll is in the
> > > > > int'rs and they all can access the container, they all can
> > > > access the
> > > > > instance cache.
> > > >
> > > > Works but would be too slow. Too many threads waking up to
> > > > see "oh, it was
> > > > not for me". Nah, the semaphore stuff I submitted should
> > > work better.
> > >
> > > You're right, as usual !
> > >
> > > I implemented the solution you suggested and it works smoothly :-))
> > >
> > > Marc, Sebastien, any result / comment from you ?
> > >
> > > BTW, I've also implemented the EJX part for the new caches,
> > > and I'm ready to
> > > commit it. With this it comes also the standardjboss.xml
> > > where I put as
> > > standard cache policy the NoPassivationCachePolicy. Is this
> > > OK for you ?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Simon
> > >
> >
