we will commit the code for the BETA-PROD release, mostly it was license
issues with Tomcat and I believe they are ironed out. In a couple of
hours...
marc
|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Lewis
|Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 11:10 AM
|To: jBoss Developer
|Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] Outstanding items for final
|
|
|
|Would it be possible for someone to at least describe, send code
|snippets, etc. for the fix to the class loader problem? We could really
|use this *today*; we have a demo in which we need this behavior.
|
|Thanks.
|
|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 12:44 PM
|> To: jBoss Developer
|> Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] Outstanding items for final
|>
|>
|> Ok since it seems some Telkel folks are adding to the
|> confusion it seems we
|> need to communicate a bit better (yes even internally Vince :).
|>
|> Tomcat integration with ClassLoader visibility and even the
|> new interceptor
|> and a j2ee deployer to top it all off is DONE just NOT
|> COMMITTED YET. Will
|> be for the final release.
|>
|> marc
|>
|>
|> |-----Original Message-----
|> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard
|> Backhouse
|> |Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 10:00 AM
|> |To: jBoss Developer
|> |Subject: Re: [jBoss-Dev] Outstanding items for final
|> |
|> |
|> |I second this. I am currently running tomcat in its own vm as I never
|> |got any resolutions on the problems I ran into. For more
|> info if needed
|> |see my previous posts.
|> |
|> |Richard Backhouse
|> |Oak Grove Software
|> |
|> |Vincent Sheffer wrote:
|> |>
|> |> I am working with a version of jBoss that I obtained from CVS a
|> |couple of days
|> |> ago and the Tomcat stuff doesn't work (I just updated my CVS
|> |tree and nothing
|> |> in the tomcat package has changed). Several other people have
|> |reported similar
|> |> problems and according to them they have seen no
|> resolution as of yet.
|> |>
|> |> So, what does "done and working great" mean? Have Sebastien
|> |and/or Daniel
|> |> actually deployed a servlet based application and seen it run
|> |with a servlet or
|> |> JSP page getting a Home object from JNDI? If so, I would be
|> |very grateful for
|> |> help in getting my test application to work. I think
|> others on the list
|> |> would be equally grateful as well. The work around
|> (adding your Tomcat
|> |> application classes to the system classpath) is far from optimal.
|> |>
|> |> If it is all working great why not just check it in so we can
|> |all share in the
|> |> new and improved Tomcat/jBoss integration?
|> |>
|> |> Thanks,
|> |> Vince
|> |>
|> |> On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, you wrote:
|> |> > |-----Original Message-----
|> |> > |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> |> > |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|> Aaron Mulder
|> |> > |Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 3:03 PM
|> |> > |To: jBoss Developer
|> |> > |Subject: [jBoss-Dev] Outstanding items for final
|> |> > |
|> |> > |
|> |> > |On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, marc fleury wrote:
|> |> > |> Aaron, how far are you from FINAL???
|> |> > |
|> |> > | Regrettably, I'm not very close. Some help would
|> be appreciated,
|> |> > |starting from the bottom of this list up (that is, I'm
|> |working from the
|> |> > |top down).
|> |> > |
|> |> > |Manual:
|> |> > | See jbossweb/manual/warning.html - there's *a lot* left
|> |> > | Most important items are EJX walkthrough and
|> descriptions of
|> |> > | jboss.xml and jaws.xml options
|> |> >
|> |> > jboss.xml and jaws.xml is pretty well described in the howto
|> |> >
|> |> > |Databases:
|> |> > | Fighting DB/2 currently
|> |> >
|> |> > ;-)
|> |> >
|> |> > | Need to test Interbase
|> |> > | Need to test Oracle 8.17 JDBC XA implementation
|> |> >
|> |> > same as above
|> |> >
|> |> > |Minerva:
|> |> > | Need to implement CallableStatement wrapper
|> |> > | Need to implement PreparedStatement cache size limit
|> |> > | Need to fix synchronization
|> |> > | Need to check on vague reports of memory leaks
|> |> >
|> |> > |Tomcat:
|> |> > | My impression is that this is only vaguely working
|> |> >
|> |> > No this is done and working great, just not commited yet.
|> |> >
|> |> > | Lots of reports of jndi.properties not loading, and
|> |> > | needing to put bean interfaces on tomcat server or
|> |> > | *system* classpath - this is definitely not right.
|> |> >
|> |> > | Still need to write a Tomcat interceptor (or whatever)
|> |> > | to make the in-VM integration work without a code
|> |> > | patch to Tomcat
|> |> >
|> |> > done
|> |> >
|> |> > |JAWS:
|> |> > | Need to change from storing handle to storing PK fields for
|> |> > | EJB references
|> |> >
|> |> > yes
|> |> >
|> |> > |DTDs:
|> |> > | Need fully-commented jboss.dtd and jaws.dtd (a la
|> the ejb-jar.dtd
|> |> > | in the EJB 1.1 spec)
|> |> >
|> |> > the dtd is done check the howto
|> |> >
|> |> > |EJX:
|> |> > | What the heck is the status of EJX? Does it work or not?
|> |> > | Is anyone going to improve the file selection interface?
|> |> >
|> |> > hear hear!
|> |> >
|> |> > |Threads:
|> |> > | Do we have the option of moving to a thread pool
|> before final?
|> |> >
|> |> > see my previous mail. As tomcat we don't care. stand alone
|> |300 is good.
|> |> >
|> |> > | It would be nice to not limit Linux so much, but I
|> suspect this
|> |> >
|> |> > so much is "misplaced" I think :))
|> |> >
|> |> >
|> |> > | is not reasonable for 2 weeks.
|> |> >
|> |> > well a JMS based one would be trivial,
|> |> >
|> |> >
|> |> > |Misc:
|> |> > | Need to write kill.jar (make server process exit
|> altogether)
|> |> >
|> |> > yes
|> |> >
|> |> > | Need to move defaultjboss/jaws.xml from JARs to
|> conf directory
|> |> > | Need to make JRMP port configurable
|> |> >
|> |> > yes!
|> |> >
|> |> >
|> |> > marc
|> |> >
|> |> > |
|> |> > |Aaron
|> |> > |
|> |> > |
|> |> > |
|> |> > |
|> |> --
|> |> _______________________
|> |> Vincent Sheffer
|> |> Director of Operations
|> |> Telkel, Inc.
|> |> _______________________
|> |
|> |
|>
|>
|>
|
|
