Hi!

Ole Husgaard wrote:
> The reason is: If is is GPL and can stand on its own,
> we are free to aggregate, as GPL places no restriction
> on "mere aggregation".

You do the same mistake as Marc IMHO. The GPL doesn't say "mere
aggregation". It says "mere aggregation on a disk storage". BIG HUGE
difference. I.e. if you put several *completely disconnected* Programs
on a CD, then those Programs do not have to be GPL just because one of
them are. In our case, I cannot see how it would fall under "mere
aggregation on a disk storage". I just don't.

> > How many want GPL (for whatever reason) and how many would be ok with
> > APL (or similar, again for whatever reason)?
> 
> I think that licences like BSD license and APL allow
> too much. 

Such as?

regards,
  Rickard

-- 
Rickard �berg

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com


Reply via email to