moving to jbosslicense
|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy "Mad" Schaefer
|Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 9:12 PM
|To: jBoss Developer
|Subject: Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Implementation
|
|
|Hi Geeks
|
|I like legal stuff and especially layers. But I think we do not
|commercially
|use or re-distribute JMX, do we?
we do redistribute and the license explicitely permits it.
The question is about #2 and the source variations of it.
amrc
|
|Have fun - Mad Andy / Better Pizza
|
|Senior Java Developer
|eBuilt Inc. (www.ebuilt.com)
|
|while( true ) { think(); write(); publish(); }
|
|----- Original Message -----
|From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|To: "jBoss Developer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 11:20 PM
|Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Implementation
|
|
|> How do you understand #2?
|>
|> I can't tell if the spec only is ok, or if the "compliant" bs
|applies only
|> on modifications of the source code they distribute?
|>
|> marc
|>
|> (from sun website)
|>
|>
|> JMX deliverables include:
|>
|> - the Specifications.
|>
|> - the Reference Implementation (RI) in source code form, and usable under
|> Sun Community Source License (SCSL). In order to foster wide
|adoption, the
|> commercial use and deployment of the Reference Implementation
|are free. In
|> order to ensure compliance, only compliant implementations can be
|> commercially used or re-distributed. Compliance requires licensing of the
|> Technology Compatibility Kit (TCK).
|>
|> - the Technology Compatibility Kit (TCK), is accessible to the JMX
|licensees
|> from the Java Licensee Engineering (JLE) website. The TCK license
|agreement
|> is bundled with a support contract, provided by JLE for $50K per year.
|>
|> - the Reference Implementation in binary code, and free for use and
|> redistribution.
|>
|>
|> |-----Original Message-----
|> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury
|> |Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 11:02 PM
|> |To: jBoss Developer
|> |Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Implementation
|> |
|> |
|> |don't take it for granted, I don't know if it is only when we use their
|> |source or in any case, will double check.
|> |
|> |marc
|> |
|> |
|> ||-----Original Message-----
|> ||From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> ||[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy
|"Mad" Schaefer
|> ||Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 11:03 PM
|> ||To: jBoss Developer
|> ||Subject: Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Implementation
|> ||
|> ||
|> ||----- Original Message -----
|> ||From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|> ||To: "jBoss Developer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
|> ||<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|> ||Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 10:44 PM
|> ||Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Implementation
|> ||
|> ||
|> ||> there just a minor thing we need to check I believe the license says
|if
|> ||you
|> ||> want "JMX compliant" then we need the compatibility kit and that is
|$50k
|> ||> need to look at it
|> ||
|> ||Oups. But I think as long as we do not say that it is "JMX Compliant"
|then
|> ||we should be still able to create a JMX Agent (in this case: not
|> ||compliant).
|> ||If not then forget it.
|> ||
|> ||Andy
|> ||
|> ||
|> ||
|> ||
|> |
|> |
|> |
|>
|>
|
|
|
