Frankly I am not convinced that the dependencies should be
defined in the jBoss.conf file (separation of concerns).
I still think that a separat MBean Service dealing with the
dependencies is better.
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: Rickard �berg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 11:46 PM
To: jBoss Developer
Subject: [jBoss-Dev] Re: [jBoss-Dev]
Hi!
marc fleury wrote:
> |I had a look at the DependencyManager and it looks good.
> |
> |I was just wondering if we shouldn't make it to a MBean
> |and when it gets registered it can perform the start of the
> |dependend MBeans according to the jboss.dependencies.
> |
> |In addition I would like to add an attribute to the jboss.properties
> |file keeping a list of the methods to call on the MBean when it
> |get started (to make it simpler we can add a parameter to the
> |DependencyManager saying what is the default method(s) to
> |call if not specified).
>
> mmm wait a second for rickard mods (tomorrow ?) and then take it from
there.
> It seems he implemented what we were talking about.
Yes, that is also true. I will shortly add a ServiceControl that will be
able to start/stop the services in the order they were registered (i.e.
the infamous jboss.conf order). This will, at least in the short term,
make the DependencyManager deprecated.
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
