|I'm ok with splitting up deploy(), but only for readability. The other |reasons are (AFAICT) non-issues. Christoph, rickard is right in that what you are looking for, i.e. a classloader association from the deployer is today done implicitely. The dissadvantages in this case are few (explicit vs implicit) and in fact it could be the only way integration will work. The reason is that we leave the deploy interfaces unchanged but we require that implementations behave correctly wrt the context class loader. marc |-- |Rickard �berg | |Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |
