Ok my 2c

SNMP uses the second approach and generates events for the listeners on
specific timers.  The reason is that you don't overload your network with
calls.

I believe you will see both in use though, also providing a RMI interface to
the first approach is simple
marc


|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Krueger
|Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 3:23 AM
|To: jBoss Developer
|Subject: Re: [jBoss-Dev] Monitoring JBoss
|
|
|At 19:05 14.12.00 , you wrote:
|>Hey all,
|>
|>while I'm writing some code that monitors the bean cache and that can be
|>then viewed in a client through JMX, I'd like to ask what do you
|think will
|>be the best between sample monitoring and event monitoring, ie:
|>- sample monitoring: the client (normally a GUI with charts)
|calls a method
|>through JMX to sample the status of JBoss every, say, 1 second
|>- event monitoring: the client is a registered listener of JMS
|messages that
|>are sent every time in JBoss some interesting value changes.
|
|I hope I understand your suggestions right but I would definiteley
|vote for
|a polling (sample) rather than a callback approach as the former is more
|firewall-friendly, which is an issue in all J2EE production
|installations I
|am in charge of. I agree that the callback approach is nicer but in real
|life polling is the more robust approach that fits better into enterprise
|or ASP environments. A polling concept together with https-tunnelling
|allows all the monitoring most people need in a secure fashion and you
|don't have a problem just monitoring your jBoss installation from a
|notebook using your mobile phone without installing any special firewall,
|proxy software whatsoever. I'd like that. Of course, having the option for
|both is best but if one has to decide for one approach, I think
|you satisfy
|more people's practical needs using the sample/polling approach.
|
|my 2c
|
|robert
|
|>If you have other suggestions, they're welcome.
|>
|>For now I'm writing a simple implementation of sample monitoring.
|>
|>Simon
|
|(-) Robert Kr�ger
|(-) SIGNAL 7 Gesellschaft f�r Informationstechnologie mbH
|(-) Br�der-Knau�-Str. 79 - 64285 Darmstadt,
|(-) Tel: 06151 665401, Fax: 06151 665373
|(-) [EMAIL PROTECTED], www.signal7.de
|
|
|


Reply via email to