Hi!
Toby Allsopp wrote:
> I agree with Christoph. If there's a global description of the entire
> system, why not just package the whole thing as one EAR?
For maintenance. It is impractical to package and update a large system
as one single EAR.
> Although I'm
> always a little nervous about relying on emergent behaviour - it's like
> simulating a flock of birds or something: each bird knows how it should
> react to the birds around it and knows how to avoid obstacles and there
> is no one bird that has the whole formation mapped out - it just
> emerges. Maybe this is cool and maybe it's asking for problems.
I'm not sure what you're referring to here. What would be the potential
problems? (Other than namespace problems)
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
