Hey,

yes I have been requesting that for the longest time.  An externalization of
the interceptor stacks in XML makes the whole container fully configurable.
Whether we will use it, I don't know, it will certainly make the stacks
modular.

Ok only 1 remark:

|The standardjboss.xml config file changes to include the current
|ContainerFactory
|interceptor setups. An example:
|  <container-configuration>
|   <container-name>Standard Stateless SessionBean</container-name>
|   <call-logging>false</call-logging>
|
|<container-invoker>org.jboss.ejb.plugins.jrmp.server.JRMPContainerI
|nvoker</container-invoker>
|   <container-interceptors>
|    <interceptor>org.jboss.ejb.plugins.LogInterceptor</interceptor>
|    <interceptor>org.jboss.ejb.plugins.SecurityInterceptor</interceptor>
|    <!-- CMT -->
|    <interceptor
|transaction="Container">org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT</int
|erceptor>
|    <interceptor transaction="Container"
|metricsEnabled="true">org.jboss.ejb.plugins.MetricsInterceptor</int
|erceptor>
|    <interceptor
|transaction="Container">org.jboss.ejb.plugins.StatelessSessionInsta
|nceInterceptor</interceptor>

Why does the SSI need to know that the transaction is "Container", in fact
why do you specify it in the name?

|    <!-- BMT -->
|    <interceptor
|transaction="Bean">org.jboss.ejb.plugins.StatelessSessionInstanceIn
|terceptor</interceptor>
|    <interceptor
|transaction="Bean">org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorBMT</interceptor>
|    <interceptor transaction="Bean"
|metricsEnabled="true">org.jboss.ejb.plugins.MetricsInterceptor</int
|erceptor>
|   </container-interceptors>

same here.

|
|<instance-pool>org.jboss.ejb.plugins.StatelessSessionInstancePool</
|instance-pool>
|...
|  </container-configuration>
|
|Let me know if there are any objections/questions. If not, I'll
|commit the change
|late Monday night.

how do we change one interceptor I can't see how we can do it "differential"
we need to specify the full stack (which is ok for now I guess).  Also how
do we specify a new stack, in jboss.xml I would assume, do you have it
documented? do you have the logic to parse that information in jboss.xml ?
does it overwrite the standardjboss.xml?

marc

|
|
|


Reply via email to