??? Why use "public" for internal methods, that are not accessed outside the
class?..
Anyway, I agree that jBoss lacks documentation. It was yesterday that I
accidentally found out, that jBoss supports isModified (that's why I
remember how it works :) ).
Alexander Klyubin
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tuomo Sahipakka
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 17:30
To: jBoss Developer
Subject: Re: [jBoss-Dev] isModified -method
Of course (?) isModifed was public. I was using it in ejbStore to
determine do I really need update db or not. The problem was I didn't
know that jboss is using isModified method. This kind of stuff should be
documented.
Alexander Klyubin wrote:
>
> But what do you mean with using "internally". If this method were private
or
> even protected, jBoss wouldn't have found it out (it uses Reflection
API)...
> Seems that it was public.
>
> Alexander Klyubin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tuomo Sahipakka
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 12:56
> To: jBoss Developer
> Subject: [jBoss-Dev] isModified -method
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a BMP Entity Bean and I had strange problems with ejbStore. It
> was not called in the end of transaction etc. After hours of debugging I
> realized that JBoss is using isModified method (which I happened to use
> internally).
>
> Anyway, I wasn't able to find any documentation about isModified method.
> Could you document this feature? It would have been great help...
>
> Thanks,
> Tuomo
