Hi all, to whom it interests ! I tried to compile JBoss with FORTE from Sun. It only works when you use the external Compilation method with the JDK 1.3. Internal Compilation fails with strange error messages. Compilation is now fine, but I still can't run JBoss under FORTE because of the getResource and getResourceAsStream URL Paths, which point to the FORTE installation Directory and not where JBoss expect them. I don't know how to fix it at the moment. Any help is appreciated !! keep you in touch ! Mohammed -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Kenworthy, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet am: Dienstag, 13. Februar 2001 09:10 An: 'jBoss Developer' Betreff: RE: [jBoss-Dev] A JBoss Security Extension Layer That sounds extremely useful. Nice job. -----Original Message----- From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 February 2001 23:22 To: jBoss Developer Subject: Re: [jBoss-Dev] A JBoss Security Extension Layer In normal EJB role based security you can't make permission checks that are a function of the arguments, external application state, or the state of the EJB. The ProjRepository example demonstrates a couple of these types of checks. >When you say 'custom' do you mean it's something I write to > include whatever advanced authorization checks I need to do? Yes, that is what I mean. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Christopherson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "jBoss Developer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 12:23 PM Subject: Re: [jBoss-Dev] A JBoss Security Extension Layer > I have to confess to being confused by the proxy layer. I'm probably being > dense here, but what do they do that normal EJB role based security > doesn't do? When you say 'custom' do you mean it's something I write to > include whatever advanced authorization checks I need to do? If so, then I > see the purpose. If not, I'm still confused - what are the advantages of > the proxies? >
