"Kenworthy, Edward" wrote:
> It's not nice, but a possible way to do this might be by manipulating the
> classpath.
> 
> For now, the jar with the jboss URLClassLoader is first, and when sun bring
> out a fix you just switch the entry in the classpath. Not nice but pretty
> common place.

This sounds trickier than just using our own classloader in the relevant
places (we're talking about 3-4 places).

regards,
  Rickard

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jung , Dr. Christoph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 13 February 2001 10:35
> To: 'jBoss Developer'
> Subject: AW: [jBoss-Dev] Re: [jBoss-User] File locking problems on
> deploym ent
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >Von: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. Februar 2001 09:36
> >An: jBoss; jBoss Developer
> >Betreff: [jBoss-Dev] Re: [jBoss-User] File locking problems on
> >deployment
> 
> >To jboss-dev:
> >I propose to copy/paste the URLClassLoader source, and fix it so that
> >the cache is flushable, hence removing this silly problem.
> 
> I agree with you that the SUN source is less than sub-optimal (and this does
> not only count for URLClassLoader). Would this make the "copying to
> temporary jar" redundant (after undeploy, the file should be unlocked,
> right)?
> 
> But since java.net.URLClassLoader is ubiquitous to the source, this would
> require a lot of reference changes, doesn´t it?  And going the way back when
> SUN fixed this issue (ok, maybe we just have a minimal chance) would be,
> again, a pain in the ass.
> 
> What is specific to URLClassLoader that is often needed and that is not
> already specified in  java.lang.ClassLoader? If it is not much (addUrl(URL)
> maybe one of these things?), I would propose, to replace all URLClassLoader
> references by java.lang.ClassLoader and to implement the lacking stuff by
> some static abstract like a org.jboss.util.ClassLoaders(.addUrl(ClassLoader
> loader, URL url)) to keep the knowledge about which detailed classloader
> implementation we currently use local.
> 
> Just my EUR0.02 (which is unfortunately quite worthless at the moment ;-)
> CGJ

-- 
Rickard Öberg

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to