In the light of Marc's answer, I was wondering, exolab (www.exolab.org)
has a functioning distributed transaction manager called Tyrex. It
implements the necessary specs and has been tested (near 1.0 version at
this point) and should be pluggable into JBoss. Can the future
implementation of JBossTX be based on Tyrex, instead of reinventing the
wheel?
And if not, then as a temporary solution:
Would others find it useful if I try integrating Tyrex as an MBean for
JBoss?
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, marc fleury wrote:
>
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anatoly Akkerman
> |Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 6:08 PM
> |To: JBoss-Dev
> |Subject: [jBoss-Dev] Distributed transactions
> |
> |
> |
> |Hello,
> |
> |I am currently trying to 'spread' a large application over several
> |machines with JBoss on it. (The test application is Sun's PetStore). At
> |this point I've been able to successfully deploy WAR on one machine with
> |JBoss+Tomcat and all the EJBs on another machine. My next step is to try
> |to move EJBs to different JBoss instances and make them communicate.
> |
> |Here is what I am wondering about. From what I could see, transactional
> |context gets passed along with B2B calls. Is transactional context valid
> |if it goes into another JBoss instance? If not, is this what distributed
>
> nope
>
> |transaction support is supposed to bring into JBoss?
>
> yes
>
> marc
>
> |
> |Anatoly Akkerman.
> |
> |
>
>
