On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Kimpton,C (Chris) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tom Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Kimpton,C (Chris) wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > NOTE The jars in the project are still the sun ones - and
> > will need to be
> > > until the scripts/other libs are independant of them too....
> >
> > Is that necessary? Why not just build with the sun stuff,
> > then you can
> > put apache/whatever in later if you want...
> >
>
> Yep - I've revised my goal now - its to allow the use of the apache one with
> no changes to jboss in anyway - so I don't plan on removing the sun stuff -
> just making sure there is no configuration that refers to it in jboss.
>
> I think the next thing to do is to upgrade ant - as the newer version (1.2)
> allows for specifying the classpath as everything in a directory - thus we
> can remove the explicit jar names from the build.xml file.
But this is exactly what I'm trying to help you avoid. Deciding which
parser jboss should use should be a configure-time/runtime decision. It
shouldn't matter whether build.xml refers to it or not, you should just be
able to change a configuration file on the deployed server and it'll all
work.
Sorry, I'm being over-persistent - but I am trying to save you effort.
Tom
--
"If you mess with something for long enough it will break." - Schmidt
