RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss Main.java

[marc fleury]

Again legacy...

2.odd 2.even serves the purpose better, so go with that, drop "FINAL"...

It serves no purpose at this point,

marc

|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
|M Stark
|Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 11:29 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss Main.java
|
|
|Can't say that I care either way but that is the convention that has been
|in use.
|
|> What's the purpose of the "FINAL" designation? I assume that it
|means that
|> this is a stable, tested release, but the word "final" doesn't make sense
|> to me. Perhaps it's just me, though.
|>
|> Toby.
|>
|
|
|
|_______________________________________________
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development