Hi,
If I understand you correctly, you do not want a ejb/jboss integrated rule
engine but rather a jdo/castor integrated rule engine? So whether or not
your requirements could be met by jbossrules is irrelevant, since it is an
ejb - rule engine integration you don't want to use it?
Thanks
david jencks
On 2001.05.08 03:40:40 -0400 Vesco Claudio wrote:
> >Hi,
>
> >I'm not sure I understand all of your description of your rule engine
> >requirements but from what I do understand I think they can be handled
> by
> >what I wrote, jbossrules. I would be interested in seeing a more
> detailed
> >explanation of what you are trying to do and may be interested in
> >implementing it as a jbossrules example.
>
> Hi and sorry for my english :-)
>
> The project for my society is now only in my head. I dont like too much
> JEOPS-approach of jbossrules. I want a better separation from entity ejb
> and jdo beans. If we use jdo, the rule system can be applied to a wide
> range of system (not only application server) and my collegues can work
> without too much troubles. I dont like too much jess (licency), but I
> can implementing a system evolving jeops.
>
> For now I have another problem, jca-castor integration, when I have
> resolved this problem then I'll dedicate time to a rule system.
>
> Claudio
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
