It's in. Sorry for the delay - I was unable to test myself due to
problems with Postgres and blobs.
thanks,
danch
Scott M Stark wrote:
> No, I have not created the JBoss_2_2_2 tag because I'm waiting for a jaws update.
> I will merge the change.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Juha Lindfors" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 2:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Please help me understand CVS tags on Sourceforge
>
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> At 14:49 30.5.2001 -0400, you wrote:
>>
>>> I need the activation bug fix made in revision 1.7 of
>>> StatefulSessionEnterpriseContext.java. Revision 1.6 has been tagged
>>> Rel_2_3_0 but 1.7 has not. Does this mean revision 1.7 will be included in a
>>> release after 2.3.0?
>>
>> yes, everything after Rel_2_3_0 will go into 2.4 stable release once we
>> feature freeze the 2.3 development and move into 2.4 beta stage (should
>> happen soon, maybe after J1?).
>>
>> However this particular fix looks like something we should put into 2.2.2
>> as well. Scott, did you tag it yet, can you merge this one in?
>>
>> -- Juha
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jboss-development mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
