OK, I think we're talking about the same sort of thing. This looks good.
Bill Burke wrote:
> Sorry my pseudo code was sooo confusing.
>
> Here's something better
>
> synchronized(ctx)
> {
> while (ctx.isLocked()) {
> ctx.wait(5000);
> if (ctx.isLocked()) {
> log.log("LOCKING-WAITING");
> }
> else
> {
> ctx.lock();
> break;
> }
> }
> }
>
> // do stuff...
>
> synchronized(ctx)
> {
> ctx.unlock();
> ctx.notify();
> }
>
> I think this, or something like it, will work....Important to note....I
> don't think you should catch InterruptedException because I'm not sure how
> Transaction Timeouts work.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
- Missing wait/notify (was Re: [JBoss-dev] A... danch (Dan Christopherson)
- Re: Missing wait/notify (was Re: [JBos... danch (Dan Christopherson)
- RE: Missing wait/notify (was Re: [... Bill Burke
- Re: Missing wait/notify (was R... danch (Dan Christopherson)
- RE: Missing wait/notify (... Bill Burke
- Re: Missing wait/noti... danch (Dan Christopherson)
- Re: Missing wait/noti... K.V. Vinay Menon
- Re: Missing wait/noti... danch
- Re: Missing wait/noti... Georg Rehfeld
- RE: Missing wait/noti... Bill Burke
- Re: Missing wait/noti... danch
- Re: Missing wait/notify (was Re: [... Georg Rehfeld
- Re: Missing wait/notify (was R... danch (Dan Christopherson)
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Avoiding Locks for READ-ONLY Be... Jay Walters
- Re: [JBoss-dev] Avoiding Locks for READ-ON... K.V. Vinay Menon
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Avoiding Locks for READ-ONLY Be... Jack Saisi
