You can say that methods in an interface are abstract, since the
interface doesn't contain an implementation.
But I see no reason for declaring them abstract, since the abstract keyword
only has meaning when used in a class definition.
Sun doesn't declare methods in the interfaces abstract -- check the Javadoc
generated from EJB 2.0 PFD2 compared to jboss-j2ee.
I think we -- and I would be willing to do that -- should clean the
interfaces such that they don't use the abstract keyword.
And a bit more Javadoc wouldn't hurt ;)
Cheers,
Jesper
On Monday 11 June 2001 12:22, you wrote:
> Not from the point of view of how things work. Interfaces are always
> abstract. I am pretty sure that is the way sun declares them which is why
> we did them that way first time.
>
> Javadoc certainly won't hurt.
>
> By he way Marc F, Jesper did the first pass of EJB 2.0 support for the
> jboss-j2ee project so he's been contributing...
>
> Cheers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesper Pedersen
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 6/11/01 2:39 AM
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] Reason for abstract methods in jboss-j2ee
>
> Hi.
>
> Is there a reason for declaring the interface methods in jboss-j2ee for
> abstract ?
>
> If not I'll clean it up and add JavaDoc ;)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jesper
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
