Hi Geeks
According to the JMX Specification:
- CONNECTORs create a transparent view to the remote MBS
through Java which therefore needs Java on the client.
Protocol examples are: RMI/RMI-IIOP/JMS
- ADAPTORs allows you to connect to the remote MBeanServer
through its protocol and needs not Java on the client.
But the Adaptor has to translate the Objects and Request
to the protocol it supports.
Protocol examples are: HTML/JMS
Please note that there is a missmatch in the protocols because
HTML/RMI/RMI-IIOP are (sloppy) presentation protocols whereare
JMS is a transport protocol. Therefore JMS can be used as
Connector or as Adaptor because it depends on how you make the
presentation on top of that (That is also the reason why I
think HTTP is wrong because it is the transport protocol).
Have fun - Andy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 9:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Feature Requests-432122 ] JMX RMI
> Connector Enhancements
>
>
> This is a good idea,
>
> part of what I want to do for JBoss 3.0 is the General
> Purpose Architecture,
> which offers connectors PER MBEANSERVER at the VM level, the
> connectors can
> be RMI, RMI/IIOP, SOAP, HTTP, JMS anything and we carry the
> message to the
> target containers (or MBeans). We would need to be able to
> create a series
> of connectors PER MBS in a given VM...
>
> will keep a thread on that one
>
> marc
>
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 11:36 AM
> |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Subject: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Feature Requests-432122 ] JMX
> RMI Connector
> |Enhancements
> |
> |
> |Feature Requests item #432122, was updated on 2001-06-11 08:36
> |You can respond by visiting:
> |http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376688&aid=432122&;
> |group_id=22866
> |
> |Category: None
> |Group: None
> |Status: Open
> |Priority: 5
> |Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
> |Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
> |Summary: JMX RMI Connector Enhancements
> |
> |Initial Comment:
> |Additional parameter to allow multiple JMX
> |RMIConnector per host to be registered in a Naming
> |Service. Currently we are limited to one
> |RMIConnectorService per machine because of the name
> |binding. This prevents the running of multiple agents
> |in separate VMs (perhaps on a multi-processor machine)
> |controled by multiple RMIConnectors.
> |
> |
> |-------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> |
> |You can respond by visiting:
> |http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376688&aid=432122&;
> |group_id=22866
> |
> |_______________________________________________
> |Jboss-development mailing list
> |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
