Agreed. Let's make it so. How about trying for a code freeze as of next
Monday (June 18 2001).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ole Husgaard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RabbitHole branch created
> Hi,
>
> I agree, and think that having _two_ unstable branches
> is a pain in <whatever comes to mind>.
> And when these branches differ more and more, merging
> patches will become more and more painful.
>
> I would suggest:
>
> a) Calling out a code freeze on the current 2.3 series.
> b) When the main branch is stable after a few days of
> freeze, that becomes 2.4.0. Bugs still present there
> can be fixed in 2.4.1, 2.4.2....
> c) New, unstable (MAIN branbch) 2.5 series is used
> instead of the RabbitHole branch, working towards
> the 3.0 release.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Ole Husgaard.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
