Please send you version of good dtds, I can review them as well.
Or better : post them on sourceforge.
Thanks.
Vincent.

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Mike
> Swainston-Rainford
> Envoyé : vendredi 15 juin 2001 11:46
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : RE: [JBoss-dev] Is Monday still a good 2.4 freeze date
>
>
> Aren't there still some errors in the jboss.dtd as well? If I remember
> correctly max-bean-life and overager-period are not defined.
>
> I was trying to get the dtds corrected for the Together JBoss
> deployer and
> then submit them for incorporation in CVS but they are such a
> moving target
> I had to freeze them for 2.2.2 and include them with the deployer
> distribution to guarantee that the Together XML editor would open
> them OK.
> (I have what I believe are valid and complete DTDs for the 2.2 release -
> some of the comments need the wording tidying up but the
> structure is correct).
>
> Is there an 'official' public URL for the dtd files. The documentation
> pages link to www.jboss.org/documentation/jboss.dtd and jaws.dtd is there
> as well. (jboss-web.dtd isn't) But I believe they are out of date with
> respect to the current 2.2.2 release (the debug element isn't
> mentioned in
> jaws.dtd for example).
>
> In view of the major changes to the dtd betwixt 2.2 and 2.3/2.4 shouldn't
> there be a version number added to the files so that the 2.4 file is a
> different beast to the 2.2 file? The jboss.xml secure element has been
> sensibly renamed but its no longer backwards compatible with 2.2.
>
> Maybe the dtd files should be put under www.jboss.org/dtds with a frozen
> version for Jboss 2.2.2 named jboss.dtd, jboss-web.dtd and jaws.dtd. The
> 2.4 versions could be renamed jboss-1_1.dtd? jboss-2_4.dtd?
>
> What problems would renaming the files cause in the development
> of JBoss? I
> don't think it would cause any major grief to users of JBoss - if
> they are
> using CVS they are going to expect some problems and inconsistencies :-)
>
> I also think a very small tutorial example using all the XML files -
> application, web, ejb, jboss, jboss-web and jaws would be a
> useful addition
> to the documentation for developers new to ejb and/or jboss. The CDEjb
> example with the jsp stuff added is probably a good candidate (except for
> MDB). This needs a 2.2 version and then a 2.4 version to cover all the
> additional stuff.
>
> BTW the cdejb with jsp example that I've got with the latest deployer
> generates all of the xml files from the Together diagrams. I'm
> planning on
> keeping this example up to date with the deployer - so I want to
> get a 2.4
> deployer plus example out that supports all the extras in the dtds. I was
> also going to retrofit/correct the Ant build scripts and .bat .sh
> files so
> that it can be used with or without Together ie put the generated .xml
> files into resources so that the Ant build.xml can use them.
>
> If you think its sensible to provide the tutorial example I can start
> tidying it up/fixing it. If my updated versions of the dtds would
> be useful
> I can mail them.
>
> Mike S-R
>
> At 09:20 15/06/2001 +0200, you wrote:
> >Hi,
> >IMHO, the re-deployment problem (see below) should stop you making a new
> >release.
> >
> >For my part, I will test/validate the new DTD validation option as some
> >elements are still missing from jaws.dtd (cmp-field is not
> defined).  I will
> >take care of dtd corrections.
> >
> >Vincent.
> >
> >[Container Management Proxy] Destroyed
> >[Default] javax.management.InstanceAlreadyExistsException:
> >Management:container=bank/Account
> >[Default]       at
> >com.sun.management.jmx.RepositorySupport.addMBean(RepositorySuppo
> rt.java:134
> >)
> >[Default]
> >[Default]       at
> >com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.internal_addObject(MBeanSe
> rverImpl.ja
> >va:
> >[Default]
> >[Default]       at
> >com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.createMBean(MBeanServerImp
> l.java:388)
> >[Default]
> >[Default]       at
> >org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.registerContainer(ContainerFactory
> .java:716)
> >[Default]
> >[Default]       at
> >org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.createEntityContainer(ContainerFac
> tory.java:7
> >00)
> >[Default]
> >[Default]       at
> >org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.createContainer(ContainerFactory.java:599)
> >[Default]
> >[Default]       at
> >org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.deploy(ContainerFactory.java:471)
> >[Default]
> >[Default]       at
> >org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.deploy(ContainerFactory.java:366)
> >[Default]
> >[Default]       at
> >org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.deploy(ContainerFactory.java:305)
> >[Default]
> >[Default]       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
> >[Default]
> >[Default]       at
> >com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1628)
> >[Default]
> >[Default]       at
> >com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1523)
> >[Default]
> >[Default]       at
> >org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.startModules(J2eeDeployer.java:489)
> >[Default]
> >[Default]       at
> >org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.startApplication(J2eeDeployer.java:467)
> >[Default]
> >[Default]       at
> >org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.deploy(J2eeDeployer.java:211)
> >[Default]
> >[Default]       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
> >[Default]
> >[Default]       at
> >com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1628)
> >[Default]
> >[Default]       at
> >com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1523)
> >[Default]
> >[Default]       at
> org.jboss.ejb.AutoDeployer.deploy(AutoDeployer.java:379)
> >[Default]
> >[Default]       at org.jboss.ejb.AutoDeployer.run(AutoDeployer.java:217)
> >[Default]
> >[Default]       at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
> >[Default]
> >
> > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
> > > Scott M Stark
> > > Envoyé : vendredi 15 juin 2001 2:24
> > > À : JBoss Dev
> > > Objet : [JBoss-dev] Is Monday still a good 2.4 freeze date
> > >
> > >
> > > Is Monday still a good 2.4 freeze date for the features that
> will go into
> > > the 2.4 release or is more time needed?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Jboss-development mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
> >
> >_________________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Jboss-development mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>


_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to