Talking about pools, While looking at the ASF stuff, it looks like every
depolyed MDB gets it's own Thread Pool.. I have a feeling that this is NOT
how it's soposed to be.
Regards,
Hiram
>From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] High load...
>Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 23:30:32 -0400
>
>|2 entity beans. 2 connection pools(but same database), each connection
>pool
>|is configured to use a certain JDBC isolation level. Entity 1 is attach to
>|pool 1, Entity 2 is attached to pool 2.
>
>yuck...
>
>I still don't have a clear answer to
>
>what we do = (does a jdbc connection support setting isolations level on
>the
>fly)? we use one pool and the container sets levels : we are stuck with
>many
>pools
>
>marcf
>
>PS: of course many pools works but yuck!
>
>|
>|1. Start JBoss transaction
>|2. Access Entity1. A connection is grabbed from pool 1,
>|connection1.setIsolation(blah blah),
>|3. access entity2. A connection is created from pool 2,
>|connection2.setIsolation(blah blah)
>|4. End JBoss transaction. commit is called on connection 1 and connection
>|2.
>|
>|This should work, shouldn't it?
>|
>|Regards,
>|
>|Bill
>|
>|
>|
>|_______________________________________________
>|Jboss-development mailing list
>|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>|http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Jboss-development mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
