-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2001 18:03
>An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Betreff: RE: [JBoss-dev] METHOD-INVOCATION (introducing profiling
>support)
>I believe we should in fact move EVERYTHING to the map, the user the method
>the tx everything
>so that the MI is just a big
>MI {
>Map
>}
>and in the map we have pairs
>user Object
>method Object
>params Object[]
>myInformationThatIOnlyUseInMyOwnLittleApplication
>Object[Maps[Array[OfMyStuff]]]]
>would that cut it? yes we pay a price (map lookup) but it is on a small
>map.
that would perfectly cut it.
>The only tricky part is that it needs to be serializable, (or not actually
>but we would need to write the map item by item and catch the
>non-serializability).
as a first approach I would say that it is in the responsibility of the
invoker/interceptor
developers to either put only serializable instances in there or to remove
any non-serializable stuff
before returning to their predecessor in the chain
... now that I write it, there was once this idea of having
a "tree of responsibility" or at least of several invokers feeding the same
chain, maybe we could realise this also in RabbitHole? ...
hence we could rely on a serializable HashMap or whatever.
I´d be glad to assist you wherever possible in that respect ...
CGJ
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
