If the licence becomes an issue, I will rewite all added features since the
license change. (After I finish CMP 2.0).
-dain
----- Original Message -----
From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 3:03 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Transition to JCA only - should I commit now?
> | Unless you revert back to the last version of Minerva that was
> |included in JBoss, the license for code that currently states that is
> |usees the X license must continue to use the X license - in particular,
>
> and of course you have got the transfer of copyright from all the
developers
> that helped you on JBoss cvs well documented and sitting tight with your
> lawyer, which would make the change from LGPL to X legal in the first
place.
> :) Honestly I don't really care, it is compatible
>
> But yeah new contributions should be LGPL just for uniformity, and I am
not
> about to enforce LGPL abiding on my own contributors. If you feel
strongly
> David, you can take the minerva code under LGPL and make sure the new JCA
is
> re-written, again I don't feel strongly.
>
> Thanks
>
> marcf
>
> |all of the JCA code was added after the license was changed to X. New
> |code can of course use LGPL.
> |
> |Aaron
> |
> |
> |_______________________________________________
> |Jboss-development mailing list
> |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
