Might be a good idea to change the Rel* stuff to JBoss* or jboss_ so that
case is predictable. Then other modules and projects could follow suite.
Just my opinion though.
--jason
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
> Releases are <major>.<minor>.<patch> so it is a 1.0.0 release. Only the
> internal tags use 4 digits: Rel_<major>.<even_minor>.<patch>.<build>
>
> You can't use Rel_xxx tags as these will conflict with the JBoss use of
> them so it would have to be RelMQ_1_0_0_0. The final 1.0.0 release
> should be tagged with something like JBossMQ_1_0_0
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hiram Chirino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 8:22 PM
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] CVS Tagging for MQ
>
>
> > Scott...
> >
> > I wanted to know how I should handle tagging the CVS for the upcomming
> > versioning of the MQ module to 1.0 beta.
> >
> > First of all if I go by the admin howto on the website it would have to be
> > 1.0.0.0 beta right??
> >
> > And would I tag with Rel_1_0_0_0??? or should I use a RelMQ_1_0_0_0 or
> > something like that?
> >
> > Regards.
> > Hiram
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jboss-development mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
