The main reason is that making the classloader architecture real is taking
me a tremendous amount of energy.  It is new work and I underestimated the
complexity.  I should have known it was research back in december, actually
thank god I had Dr Jung's scope work (he did most of it).  It is there it is
real and I need to move on.

The bottom line is let's do some "HEAD" progress with everyone.  I am not
interested in "tower coding" where I go and code all alone.  Solo coding is
not the best open source policy I want a bazaar of coding for RH, there is
too much talent in this list to not try a real bazaar style development. I
am not superman and can't do that also I don't want to do that...

I want people to adopt RH as their own and the best way to achieve that is
making sure that most RH code IS their own :)
Just trust me on that one I am starting to know how open source works and
what makes people tick what makes people passionate.  If we are really going
to go head to head with MS technology, I really don't want to go alone ...

care to come with me? we can win that one, really. at ease gentlemen at
ease.

PLgWar

marcf

|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 7:37 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] transaction timeouts broken?
|
|
|> yes, it is real but kinda "obscure" :) WANT TO COMMIT RH!!!!
|
|Is there any reason why you did not branch MAIN and code there?
|
|--jason
|
|
|_______________________________________________
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to