> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of danch
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Enhydra vs. JBoss
>
>
> Another thing that bothered me about the article was the apparent lack
> of cluefulness about what open source _is_: they didn't mention the
> difference in license terms or the fact that JBoss can be used by and
> contributed to by anyone.
>
What bothered me also, was they were talking about "Java compatibility" from
Sun. It's "J2EE" compliant, not java compliance.
"That may undermine claims of Java compatibility."
Makes it sound like JBoss might only run on NT or something like that.
Bill
> -danch
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 12:22:46PM -0400, Bill Burke wrote:
> > >From reading the IBD article, is Enhydra a competitor of
> JBoss? I went to
> > their web site and it seemed that Enhydra really wasn't "Open
> Source", but a
> > J2EE implementation that came with the source. If they are a
> competitor in
> > the Open Source arena, how can we kick their ass? Or maybe we
> already do?
> >
> > Bill
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
