I already reported several times with the procedure described below that I
want to unsuscribe my entry in the mailing list.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
eforge.net To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:
Jboss-development digest, Vol 1 #1368 - 3 msgs
orge.net
04.09.2001 11:19
Please respond to jboss-development
Send Jboss-development mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Jboss-development digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Automated JBoss Testsuite Results ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
2. RMIClientConnectorImpl and printStackTrace (Mike Swainston-Rainford)
3. Re: Jboss-development digest, Vol 1 #1367 - 9 msgs (Peter Morath)
--__--__--
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 09:51:22 +0100
Cc:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 82
--------------------------------------------
Successful tests: 15
Errors: 36
Failures: 31
--------------------------------------------
[time of test: 4 September 2001 9:49 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
[java.vm.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vm.name: Classic VM]
[java.vm.info: J2RE 1.3.0 IBM build cx130-20010626 (JIT enabled: jitc)]
[os.name: Linux]
[os.arch: x86]
[os.version: 2.4.3-12]
See http://lubega.com for full details
NOTE: If there are any errors shown above - this mail is only highlighting
them - it is NOT indicating that they are being looked at by anyone.
It is assumed that whoever makes change(s) to jboss that
break the test will be fixing the test or jboss, as appropriate!
--------------------------------------------
DETAILS OF ERRORS
[details not shown - as this makes the mail too big to reach the sf mailing
list]
--__--__--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 10:12:23 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mike Swainston-Rainford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [JBoss-dev] RMIClientConnectorImpl and printStackTrace
Hi
the RMIClientConnectorImpl in org.jboss.jmx.client has a few
printStackTrace calls in it. Done in the invoke() method for example if a
RemoteException is caught. Null is returned (which I'm testing for) but the
stack trace on the Together ControlCenter console looks really messy. Could
someone remove the printStackTrace calls for me?
thanks
Mike S-R
--__--__--
Message: 3
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Peter Morath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:17:23 +0200
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Re: Jboss-development digest, Vol 1 #1367 - 9 msgs
I already reported that I want to cancel my entry in the mail list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
eforge.net To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:
Jboss-development digest, Vol 1 #1367 - 9 msgs
orge.net
04.09.2001 10:47
Please respond to jboss-development
Send Jboss-development mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Jboss-development digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: build system change (Scott M Stark)
2. Re: build system change (Jason Dillon)
3. Re: build system change (Scott M Stark)
4. Re: build system change (Jason Dillon)
5. test - another email - does this get through? (Kimpton,C (Chris))
6. Re: test - another email - does this get through? (Chris Kimpton)
7. FW: Automated JBoss Testsuite Results (Kimpton,C (Chris))
8. CVS update: jbosstest build.xml (Chris Kimpton)
9. CVS update: jbosstest/src/stylesheets summary1a.xsl (Chris Kimpton)
-- __--__--
Message: 1
Reply-To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] build system change
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 22:54:11 -0700
Organization: JBoss Group
Is the testsuite supposed to be building yet? I see numerous errors and
warnings. The warnings are due to the junit3.7 deprecation of the assert()
method in favor of assertTrue()
testsuite 1064>./build.sh
Searching for build.xml ...
Buildfile: /home/starksm/cvsroot/Main/jboss-all/testsuite/build.xml
init-buildlog:
init:
[moduleinfo] Project root: /home/starksm/cvsroot/Main/jboss-all
[moduleinfo] Module root: /home/starksm/cvsroot/Main/jboss-all/testsuite
compile-classes:
[mkdir] Created dir:
/home/starksm/cvsroot/Main/jboss-all/testsuite/output/classes
[javac] Compiling 274 source files to
/home/starksm/cvsroot/Main/jboss-all/testsuite/output/classes
[javac]
/home/starksm/cvsroot/Main/jboss-all/testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/bank/
ejb/AccountBean.java:8: cannot resolve symbol
[javac] symbol : class CreateException
[javac] location: package ejb
[javac] import javax.ejb.CreateException;
[javac] ^
[javac]
/home/starksm/cvsroot/Main/jboss-all/testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/util/
ejb/EntitySupport.java:8: package javax.ejb does not exist
[javac] import javax.ejb.*;
[javac] ^
[javac]
/home/starksm/cvsroot/Main/jboss-all/testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/util/
ejb/EntitySupport.java:18: cannot resolve symbol
[javac] symbol : class EntityBean
[javac] location: class org.jboss.test.util.ejb.EntitySupport
[javac] implements EntityBean
[javac] ^
...
[javac]
/home/starksm/cvsroot/Main/jboss-all/testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/testb
ean/test/Main.java:632: warning: assert(java.lang.String,boolean) in
junit.framework.Assert has been deprecated
[javac] assert("pkBean != null", pkBean != null);
[javac] ^
[javac] 100 errors
[javac] 125 warnings
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 10:21 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] build system change
> I finished the first round of modifications to the jboss-* modules, to
make
> it easier to share modules between projects. The release mechanism has
been
> moved to the control module, which will pull the generated files from the
> source module after that module has been executed.
>
> I did away with the 'min' targets. They were mostly useless. I am
keeping
> the most targets though, and using them as the default in most cases.
>
> I have not had time to update jboss-docs, jboss-website or jboss-mq with
the
> new release semantics, but I should get to that soon.
>
> I left the release-* targets in each source module, but all that is
really
> used for now is creating an archive of the files under output/*.
Eventually
> this mechanism could be used for plugins to generate a .sar (.jsr, .ear,
> whatever), so some docs them make a nice archive of it.
>
> The release-dependencies have all moved to the control module, which
means
> that I had to move over the thirdparty properties too. I don't really
like
> that too much, but in the short term there is no way to get around it.
>
> I also tried to remember to give each build.xml a valid name, for those
who
> have ide's which use that value. I also tried to change the
> junit.jvm.options to -Ddummy from -client.
>
> It looks like Ant 1.4 will allow <path> elements to be created from
inside
> of a <target>, so once I have finished updating the projects, I might
look
> to moving everything that is currently outside of a <target> into one.
This
> will make it easier to group properties and patsh with helper tasks
> together. Like for the path convertion task, which might be required for
> the manual module under win32.
>
> Let me know if there are any problems.
>
> --jason
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
-- __--__--
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 23:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Scott M Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] build system change
Yup, it does work... mostly. Did you get any of the email that I sent to
you about the security tests?
I think there might be some config or file placement issues. I had to
change the way several jar files were being created to avoid having one jar
build be dependent on the jar build before it (ie. movies files around to
get a jboss.xml and ejb-jar.xml file). I would really like to change all
of
these to use the <war> <ear> and <ejbjar> tasks, but that will required
more
time than I have at the moment (my guess is that it could be done in 2
days).
We should really replace assert() usage. It is on my list of things to
look
into further, along with a common JBossTestsuite class, and other testsuite
improvements.
I would rather not turn of deprecation warnings if it can be avoided.
--jason
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
> Is the testsuite supposed to be building yet? I see numerous errors and
> warnings. The warnings are due to the junit3.7 deprecation of the assert
()
> method in favor of assertTrue()
>
> testsuite 1064>./build.sh
> Searching for build.xml ...
> Buildfile: /home/starksm/cvsroot/Main/jboss-all/testsuite/build.xml
>
> init-buildlog:
>
> init:
> [moduleinfo] Project root: /home/starksm/cvsroot/Main/jboss-all
> [moduleinfo] Module root: /home/starksm/cvsroot/Main/jboss-all/testsuite
>
> compile-classes:
> [mkdir] Created dir:
> /home/starksm/cvsroot/Main/jboss-all/testsuite/output/classes
> [javac] Compiling 274 source files to
> /home/starksm/cvsroot/Main/jboss-all/testsuite/output/classes
> [javac]
>
/home/starksm/cvsroot/Main/jboss-all/testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/bank/
> ejb/AccountBean.java:8: cannot resolve symbol
> [javac] symbol : class CreateException
> [javac] location: package ejb
> [javac] import javax.ejb.CreateException;
> [javac] ^
> [javac]
>
/home/starksm/cvsroot/Main/jboss-all/testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/util/
> ejb/EntitySupport.java:8: package javax.ejb does not exist
> [javac] import javax.ejb.*;
> [javac] ^
> [javac]
>
/home/starksm/cvsroot/Main/jboss-all/testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/util/
> ejb/EntitySupport.java:18: cannot resolve symbol
> [javac] symbol : class EntityBean
> [javac] location: class org.jboss.test.util.ejb.EntitySupport
> [javac] implements EntityBean
> [javac] ^
> ...
> [javac]
>
/home/starksm/cvsroot/Main/jboss-all/testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/testb
> ean/test/Main.java:632: warning: assert(java.lang.String,boolean) in
> junit.framework.Assert has been deprecated
> [javac] assert("pkBean != null", pkBean != null);
> [javac] ^
> [javac] 100 errors
> [javac] 125 warnings
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 10:21 PM
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] build system change
>
>
> > I finished the first round of modifications to the jboss-* modules, to
> make
> > it easier to share modules between projects. The release mechanism has
> been
> > moved to the control module, which will pull the generated files from
the
> > source module after that module has been executed.
> >
> > I did away with the 'min' targets. They were mostly useless. I am
> keeping
> > the most targets though, and using them as the default in most cases.
> >
> > I have not had time to update jboss-docs, jboss-website or jboss-mq
with
> the
> > new release semantics, but I should get to that soon.
> >
> > I left the release-* targets in each source module, but all that is
really
> > used for now is creating an archive of the files under output/*.
> Eventually
> > this mechanism could be used for plugins to generate a .sar (.jsr,
.ear,
> > whatever), so some docs them make a nice archive of it.
> >
> > The release-dependencies have all moved to the control module, which
means
> > that I had to move over the thirdparty properties too. I don't really
> like
> > that too much, but in the short term there is no way to get around it.
> >
> > I also tried to remember to give each build.xml a valid name, for those
> who
> > have ide's which use that value. I also tried to change the
> > junit.jvm.options to -Ddummy from -client.
> >
> > It looks like Ant 1.4 will allow <path> elements to be created from
inside
> > of a <target>, so once I have finished updating the projects, I might
look
> > to moving everything that is currently outside of a <target> into one.
> This
> > will make it easier to group properties and patsh with helper tasks
> > together. Like for the path convertion task, which might be required
for
> > the manual module under win32.
> >
> > Let me know if there are any problems.
> >
> > --jason
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jboss-development mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
-- __--__--
Message: 3
Reply-To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] build system change
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 00:02:07 -0700
Organization: JBoss Group
The testsuite is expecting that a number of packages have been built but it
is not validating that they have. This is the source of the numerous
errors.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 11:35 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] build system change
> Yup, it does work... mostly. Did you get any of the email that I sent to
> you about the security tests?
>
> I think there might be some config or file placement issues. I had to
> change the way several jar files were being created to avoid having one
jar
> build be dependent on the jar build before it (ie. movies files around to
> get a jboss.xml and ejb-jar.xml file). I would really like to change all
of
> these to use the <war> <ear> and <ejbjar> tasks, but that will required
more
> time than I have at the moment (my guess is that it could be done in 2
> days).
>
> We should really replace assert() usage. It is on my list of things to
look
> into further, along with a common JBossTestsuite class, and other
testsuite
> improvements.
>
> I would rather not turn of deprecation warnings if it can be avoided.
>
> --jason
>
>
-- __--__--
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 00:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Scott M Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] build system change
'testsuite' does not build anything, it simply runs the jboss/testsuite
'tests' target. Too build everything, then run the testsuite, use most,
main or all as the target to execute before testsuite.
./build.sh most testsuite
'all' will simply make docs too, which aren't very useful for testing.
The 'run-nightly' target should update, clean, build, start jboss, run the
tests, stop jboss then generate reports. If you are trying to setup a
recurring testsuite run then it should be used. It might need to be update
for these latest changes though.
Invoking all child modules, even if they don't build anything, isn't a fast
process. I think there are still some problems past that though. I had to
create a new jndi.properties in src/resources because I couldn't really
figure out where the jndi.properties came from before. Could be that there
were some other files included in this mysterious way which I have missed.
--jason
the most On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
> The testsuite is expecting that a number of packages have been built but
it
> is not validating that they have. This is the source of the numerous
errors.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 11:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] build system change
>
>
> > Yup, it does work... mostly. Did you get any of the email that I sent
to
> > you about the security tests?
> >
> > I think there might be some config or file placement issues. I had to
> > change the way several jar files were being created to avoid having one
> jar
> > build be dependent on the jar build before it (ie. movies files around
to
> > get a jboss.xml and ejb-jar.xml file). I would really like to change
all
> of
> > these to use the <war> <ear> and <ejbjar> tasks, but that will required
> more
> > time than I have at the moment (my guess is that it could be done in 2
> > days).
> >
> > We should really replace assert() usage. It is on my list of things to
> look
> > into further, along with a common JBossTestsuite class, and other
> testsuite
> > improvements.
> >
> > I would rather not turn of deprecation warnings if it can be avoided.
> >
> > --jason
> >
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
-- __--__--
Message: 5
From: "Kimpton,C (Chris)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 09:03:58 +0100
Subject: [JBoss-dev] test - another email - does this get through?
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
This electronic message (email) and any attachments to it are subject to
copyright and are sent for the personal attention of the addressee.
Although you may be the named recipient, it may become apparent that this
email and its contents are not intended for you and an addressing error has
been made. This email may include information that is legally privileged
and exempt from disclosure. If you have received this email in error,
please advise us immediately and delete this email and any attachments from
your computer system.Rabobank International is the trading name of
Co=F6peratieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. which is
incorporated in the Netherlands. Registered with the Registrar of Companies
for England & Wales No. BR002630 and regulated by the SFA for the conduct
of investment business in the UK.
The presence of this footnote also confirms that this email has been
automatically checked by Rabobank International for the presence of
computer viruses prior to it being sent, however, no guarantee is given or
implied that this email is virus free upon delivery.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
-- __--__--
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 01:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chris Kimpton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] test - another email - does this get through?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HELP!
How come this mail got through to the list but the others I sent did
not:
I forwarded the daily test results
I copied and pasted them to a new message
I forwarded them with a new subject....
I'll try shortening the message - maybe its a size limit thing?
Chris
=====
Need somewhere to Live in London - http://freeflats.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com
-- __--__--
Message: 7
From: "Kimpton,C (Chris)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 09:33:31 +0100
Subject: [JBoss-dev] FW: Automated JBoss Testsuite Results
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
> Sent: Tuesday, 04 September 2001 08:53
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Automated JBoss Testsuite Results
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> JBoss daily test results
>=20
> SUMMARY
>=20
> Number of tests run: 82
>=20
> --------------------------------------------
>=20
> Successful tests: 15
>=20
> Errors: 36
>=20
> Failures: 31
>=20
> --------------------------------------------
>=20
>=20
[snip]
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
This electronic message (email) and any attachments to it are subject to
copyright and are sent for the personal attention of the addressee.
Although you may be the named recipient, it may become apparent that this
email and its contents are not intended for you and an addressing error has
been made. This email may include information that is legally privileged
and exempt from disclosure. If you have received this email in error,
please advise us immediately and delete this email and any attachments from
your computer system.Rabobank International is the trading name of
Co=F6peratieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. which is
incorporated in the Netherlands. Registered with the Registrar of Companies
for England & Wales No. BR002630 and regulated by the SFA for the conduct
of investment business in the UK.
The presence of this footnote also confirms that this email has been
automatically checked by Rabobank International for the presence of
computer viruses prior to it being sent, however, no guarantee is given or
implied that this email is virus free upon delivery.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
-- __--__--
Message: 8
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Chris Kimpton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 01:45:39 -0700
Subject: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosstest build.xml
User: kimptoc
Date: 01/09/04 01:45:39
Modified: . build.xml
Log:
made the text results report very short
Revision Changes Path
1.11 +2 -2 jbosstest/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/jboss/jbosstest/build.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11
--- build.xml 2001/09/04 05:08:09 1.10
+++ build.xml 2001/09/04 08:45:39 1.11
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
<!--
-->
<!--
====================================================================== -->
-<!-- $Id: build.xml,v 1.10 2001/09/04 05:08:09 user57 Exp $ -->
+<!-- $Id: build.xml,v 1.11 2001/09/04 08:45:39 kimptoc Exp $ -->
<project default="main" name="JBoss/Testsuite">
@@ -1539,7 +1539,7 @@
<style basedir="${build.reports}"
destdir="${build.reports}/text"
extension=".txt"
- style="${build.stylesheets}/summary1.xsl"
+ style="${build.stylesheets}/summary1a.xsl"
includes="TESTS-TestSuites.xml">
<param name="thedate" expression="${TIMENOW}"/>
<param name="java_version" expression="${java.version}"/>
-- __--__--
Message: 9
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Chris Kimpton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 01:45:39 -0700
Subject: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosstest/src/stylesheets summary1a.xsl
User: kimptoc
Date: 01/09/04 01:45:39
Added: src/stylesheets summary1a.xsl
Log:
made the text results report very short
Revision Changes Path
1.1 jbosstest/src/stylesheets/summary1a.xsl
Index: summary1a.xsl
===================================================================
<?xml version='1.0'?>
<xsl:stylesheet version='1.0' xmlns:xsl
='http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform'>
<xsl:param name="thedate"/>
<xsl:param name="java_version"/>
<xsl:param name="java_vendor"/>
<xsl:param name="java_vm_version"/>
<xsl:param name="java_vm_name"/>
<xsl:param name="java_vm_info"/>
<xsl:param name="os_name"/>
<xsl:param name="os_arch"/>
<xsl:param name="os_version"/>
<xsl:output method='text'/>
<xsl:template match='/'>
<xsl:variable name="numberOfTests" select="sum(//@tests)"/>
<xsl:variable name="numberOfErrors" select="sum(//@errors)"/>
<xsl:variable name="numberOfFailures" select="sum(//@failures)"/>
<xsl:variable name="numberOfSuccesses" select="$numberOfTests -
$numberOfErrors - $numberOfFailures"/>
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: <xsl:value-of select="$numberOfTests"/>
--------------------------------------------
Successful tests: <xsl:value-of select="$numberOfSuccesses"/>
Errors: <xsl:value-of select="$numberOfErrors"/>
Failures: <xsl:value-of select="$numberOfFailures"/>
--------------------------------------------
[time of test: <xsl:value-of select="$thedate"/> GMT]
[java.version: <xsl:value-of select="$java_version"/>]
[java.vendor: <xsl:value-of select="$java_vendor"/>]
[java.vm.version: <xsl:value-of select="$java_vm_version"/>]
[java.vm.name: <xsl:value-of select="$java_vm_name"/>]
[java.vm.info: <xsl:value-of select="$java_vm_info"/>]
[os.name: <xsl:value-of select="$os_name"/>]
[os.arch: <xsl:value-of select="$os_arch"/>]
[os.version: <xsl:value-of select="$os_version"/>]
See http://lubega.com for full details
NOTE: If there are any errors shown above - this mail is only
highlighting
them - it is NOT indicating that they are being looked at by anyone.
It is assumed that whoever makes change(s) to jboss that
break the test will be fixing the test or jboss, as appropriate!
--------------------------------------------
<xsl:if test='$numberOfFailures!=0 or $numberOfErrors!=0'>
DETAILS OF ERRORS
[details not shown - as this makes the mail too big to reach the sf
mailing list]
</xsl:if>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
-- __--__--
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
End of Jboss-development Digest
--__--__--
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
End of Jboss-development Digest
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
