> Consequently, IMHO, comparing JINI with JavaGroups is like comparing a
> trading service vs. IIOP. Can both be mixed? most probably (one for actual
> communication, the other for cluster organization/...? ).
>
> But, IMHO again, providing J2EE clustering *requires* a
> tool/library/framework/... that provide advanced communication semantics
> whereas it may use any library for cluster organization (bad terminology),
> JINI being one. If I had to choose *only one*, JG or JINI, I would choose JG
> (because we do need this communication semantic).
Could JavaGroups be implemented as Jini service? Could it be used for
backend communication? Is it possible to create a JG/Jini bridge which
gives us the best of both worlds, as well a creating a world of its own?
--jason
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
