This sounds good.
--jason
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
> The last suggested naming convention was *TestCase.java so:
>
> *TestCase.java indicates a class containing only quick, unit tests.
>
> *StressTestCase.java indicates a class containing (only) lengthy iterative
> tests.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "jboss-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:43 PM
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] Renaming tests?
>
>
> > I'd like to do something about the test suite so we have separate unit
> > (fast) and stress (slow) test suites and so the test script doesn't try to
> > execute non test classes as tests.
> >
> > How about this naming convention:
> >
> > *UnitTest.java indicates a class containing only quick, unit tests.
> >
> > *StressTest.java indicates a class containing (only) lengthy iterative
> > tests.
> >
> > Anything else with Test in its name is not considered to be a test and is
> > not executed.
> >
> > For a first iteration I will rename all test classes so that a class with
> > any lengthy tests is a *StressTest. Later we can split them into two
> > classes, unit and stress (assuming there are any with unit and stress
> tests
> > in the same class).
> >
> > Any problems with this?
> >
> > thanks
> > david jencks
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
