ouch, ouch.

--jason


On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, marc fleury wrote:

> |We are expecting configuration files to be under the given url/conf/config,
> |which is unneeded.
>
> configuration files should be in XML/JMX format and if they are not the last
> thing we want is have them scattered everywhere.
>
> |> >  2) Setup logging as soon as possible.
> |> This is obviously a good idea, I'm not sure how much sooner it can get if
> |> its run through an mbean and loaded with a recyclable classloader.
> |
> |We already setup logging really soon, but we don't expose the configuration
> |of the logging service... which is bad.
>
> Yes but it doesnt justify the clumsy classloaded idea.  We still use
> log4j.xml.
>
> |What?  I am talking about the configuration file for booting the server.
>
> This doesn't change so don't offer it.
>
> |This does not fall over into service.xml files at all.  I want to control
> |how JBoss boots with out having to write/maintain my own version of Main or
> |a custom boot system.
>
> Jason, we are going to cut this discussion short.  In the year and a half
> that 2.0 is out I have not seen a single case of someone overwriting the
> "setup" sequence, ever!  So it is gone. I didn't remove the spartian MLet
> semantic to see it replaced with something inferior.
>
> This is mental diarreah... there are many other places where you would be
> more useful, this is not one... MOVE ON!
>
> |The current system makes many assumptions about how the
> |configuration of the
> |system will be laid out, which is not a good idea.
>
> ????
>
>
> |> > I personally have not made use of the JBoss distribution layout, ever.
> |> > It
> |> > has never fit in with my deployment scheme.
> |>
> |> Is this still so true with the new web-deploy stuff from marc?
> |Currently, to use a set of configs you need to:
> |
> | ./run.sh --net-install http://configserver --configuration myconfig
> |
> |What I suggest is that we replace this with:
> |
> | ./run.sh http://configserver/myconfig
> |
> |or
> |
> | ./run.sh http://configserver?config=myconfig
> |
> |or any other way you choose to implement the JSP/Servlet which
> |serves up the
> |config.
>
> Yes that is interesting but down the road, you guys are fighting in la-la
> land right now.
>
> ENOUGH!
>
> marcf
>
> |--jason
> |
> |
> |_______________________________________________
> |Jboss-development mailing list
> |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>


_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to