Ok, I'm fixing it.
david jencks
On 2001.09.21 00:05:12 -0400 Scott M Stark wrote:
> The issue with win32 in general is that programs tend to acquire
> exclusive
> locks on files whereas *nix does not.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Maplesden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 8:29 PM
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RH, Jetty, Service Archives...
>
>
> > It definately happens my Windows 2000 system, I don't know if it
> happens
> > under other OS's or not. The basic solution (I believe) is as you say,
> to
> > copy the original then open the copy.
> >
> > David
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 3:33 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RH, Jetty, Service Archives...
> > >
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > > > All the jars in the sar are also copied to
> > > > ${jboss.system.deployed}\sarname
> > > > to avoid the file sharing violations that prevent the user
> > > from simply
> > > > moving the original file to undeploy. This is under the
> > > assumption that
> > > > all
> > > > required classes are now in jars, I guess we can copy plain
> > > class files
> > > > too,
> > > > but jars would be neater I reckon.
> > >
> > >
> > > Is this (file sharing violations) some kind of windows-only problem?
> I
> > > haven't had it yet or I would have fixed it ;-). Is the fix
> > > to copy the
> > > original, then open the copy?
> > >
> > > david jencks
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
