On 2001.09.27 03:19:30 -0400 "Jung , Dr. Christoph" wrote: > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >Von: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. September 2001 20:41 > >An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossFilesystemRoot mbean and sar local > >directories. (rh/3.0) > > >Hmm, I guess I should experiment and see if a url like > >jar:jar:http://.../myrar.rar!/path/myjar.jar!/ works to get to the jar > >inside a rar... maybe we don't need to unpack these things. > > If I remember my experiments from a while ago, the URL is valid, but > there > is no way > to get a sun.net.www.protocol.jar.Handler sitting on a stream that is > extracted by another jar.Handler. The guy who did the name resolution > code > was seemingly more intelligent than the guy who did the specific jar > provider ;-)
I figured something like that would happen ;-) > > But the URL solution generally does not allow services to manipulate the > resource. So a file abstraction or something like that would be more > suitable. Yes, the nested jar: trick was just so (if the "opening jar prevents you from moving/changing it" problem got fixed we wouldn't have to copy and completely unpack highly nested packages (jar in rar in ear is the deepest nesting I know of required by sun). This is pretty much the limitation in our current deployment process Scott was talking about. david jencks > > CGJ > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
