Ok, then I´ll implement a tiny adaptor for that. What would be the right
default
format in the tc_path_add property ... Unix or WinX?

It´s Jasper that uses the tc_path_add property to extend its classpath just
for compilation
purposes (calls the embedded compiler with explicit, string-based arguments
:-(

Before RH, the respective jars where part of the system classpath which the
JSP compiler does indeed use!

Now, the jars are added to a subordinate classloader of the system
classloader which
makes this property very important ... until someone writes a
contextclassloader-aware compiler.

The servlet should run in the WebApplicationContext classloader as expected.

CGJ

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Peter Levart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Oktober 2001 13:15
An: Jung , Dr. Christoph; Jboss-Development (E-Mail)
Betreff: Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] Jetty JSP-Compilation


On Thursday 18 October 2001 09:57, Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote:
> I fixed this in jetty.properties, although I´m not sure whether exchanging
> the ":" with ";" in the
> compiler-classpath specification is platform-neutral?
>
> CGJ
>

It appears that it isn't. Windows might use ";". On Linux I had to change 
back to ":"...

Is this meant to be so? The classpath for JSP compiler is taken only from 
jetty.properties? It does not take into account the <classpath
archives="..." 
/> from jboss-service.xml files in conf or jetty-plugin.sar...

What about running the compiled JSPs? Which classpath is used for that?


Peter

_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to