On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > See my previous email. This shouldn't happen if the relationship is > specified the right way. > > Anyway, thanks for your good emails. You are one of the first users of the > new cmp 2.0 code, so anything you can tell us will help clean the system for > normal users. This escpecially applies to wierd, misleading or non-existant > message from the system. In the future try to keep the discussion on the > list, so users in the future will be able to look at the archive for help. >
Cool! Seems to work now. Thanks for your help. But now, I have another question. Are EJBLocalObjects valid parameters for finders? I haven't found anything on that in the spec .. If we agree, that it should be supported, it's only 2 places, that require modification: o JDBCQueryMetaDataFactory.convertToJavaClass(..) seems to use the wrong classloader o JDBCDefinedFinderCommand.setParameters(..) should handle local interfaces (obtain the pk) itself and delegate everything else to the JDBCTypeFactory Holger _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
