marc fleury wrote: > |Yes, we do. Something developed for jboss will not run on other providers. > > No offense to your co-worker and Rickard but it is a dumb rhetoric point :) > > If we offer this feature we do not break the compatibility of the J2EE > platform specification. > > The spec doesn't specify portability in features it does not specify, if you > know what I mean? > > It specifies portability in features that are defined and we don't break > that.
Just don't call it EJB. You're making it look EJB'ish. People will think it's EJB. But it's not. Hey, doesn't this remind everyone of J++? "Sure, it's Java! Great! Oh, and we got these extensions that you can use that will make you a Poweruser. Very cool! Oh, can't run on other VM's? Well.. too bad.. I guess.." > I mean it, Rickard you asleep yet? Me? No, I'm wide awake. You should consider pinching yourself tho ;-) If you want it to be EJB-ish, the best way to go about it is to join the EJB expert group, and lobby for these kinds of additions. /Rickard -- Rickard Öberg _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
