|Whether you call it init() or postRegister() I don't care. At least for |clustering and it's dependent services right now we need 2 stage |initialization init() (or equivalent API call) and start().
wow, an actual example of a 2 stage initialization. Rickard is right afair the reason for removing it is registration does the same "you are installed" callback. marcf | |> -----Original Message----- |> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of |> Rickard Oberg |> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 4:06 PM |> To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net |> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Why taking init out of MBean interface? |> |> |> Bill Burke wrote: |> |> > Why are we doing this? Some services, clustering for example, |> depend on |> > init and start. Can we not do this? |> |> |> Note that taking init() out of Service is not a big deal, whereas taking |> it out of ServiceSupport is. init() can be done as a side-effect of |> postRegister anyway so no need to expose it through the MBean interface |> (AFAICT). |> |> /Rickard |> |> -- |> Rickard �berg |> |> |> |> _______________________________________________ |> Jboss-development mailing list |> [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development |> | | | |_______________________________________________ |Jboss-development mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
