I'm wondering what the intent behind the eager-load and lazy-load-group is.
I would think that you would want to partition the cmp-fields into one eager-load and 0 or more lazy-load groups. Is this correct? If so, the current xml structure makes it pretty easy to include fields into many of these groups. Is this intentional? What should happen in this case? If a partition is really desired, perhaps an alternate xml structure along the lines of <!ELEMENT cmp-field (description?, field-name, column-name?, lazy-load-group?) <!ELEMENT lazy-load-group EMPTY> <!ATTLIST lazy-load-group group CDATA #REQUIRED> or <!ELEMENT cmp-field (description?, field-name, column-name?, lazy-load-group?) <!ELEMENT lazy-load-group #PCDATA> would be more appropriate. cmp-fields without a lazy-load-group would be in the unique eager-load group. Any thoughts? david jencks _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
