I will let dain answer this, but afaik his stuff relies on it so if it wasn't implemented you would see it.
For the record, I will mention that only NEW features where added to RH, it is not like we went I rewrote the stuff, in fact MOST of the codebase in RH is the old one. We are rewriting as we go, but stuff that dramatically changes from one to the other just shouldn't be there. That being said is there a test for local stuff in RH? We would need to run that and make sure. marcf |-----Original Message----- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of |Hunter Hillegas |Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 4:43 PM |To: JBoss Dev |Subject: [JBoss-dev] Local Interfaces in Rabbit Hole - Working? | | |Is local interface support completely implemented in Rabbit Hole at this |point? | |I thought that it was but I am having trouble with my app that uses only |local interfaces... | |Basically any attempt to grab beans via their local interfaces from my |servlets fail with a NameNotFound exception. I verified the JNDI names in |the Jboss Web console but integrated Jetty fails to track them down. | |Julian Gosnell suggested that perhaps local interfaces were not completely |implemented... | |I was wondering if that is the case... | |Thanks for any info, |Hunter | | |_______________________________________________ |Jboss-development mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
