This doesn't sound too useful unless given:
> A/B/C/val1
> A/B/C/val2
> A/D/val3
I can do Util.unbind("A") to wipe out A and its entire tree in one
call similar to rm -rf on a directory. If that is what you indicating
then its a useful option.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Budworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 12:39 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] org.jboss.naming.Util feature question
> I was just wondering if anyone would like org.jboss.naming.Util to have
> an unbind feature.
>
> Unbinding by hand is easy enough, but I need (and am using in a subclass
> of Util for my own project) the ability to make unbind remove the
> intermediate contexts if they are empty.
>
> ie:
>
> A/B/C/val1
> A/B/C/val2
> A/D/val3
>
> unbind(A/B/C/val1)
>
> would only remove "val1" from the A/B/C context
>
> then doing unbind(A/B/C/val2) // after you already unbound val1
>
> wiht remove val2, C, B contexts (but not A since it had more than one
> subcontext)
>
>
> I'd like to add this to the Util class, but wasn't sure if anyone else
> thought it was usefull, or what it should be called. I call mine
> "unbind", because it's the opposite of bind() which creates subctx.
>
> But the unweary may not realize that it nukes intermediates. So maybe
> call it unbindTree ?
>
> -David
>
> p.s. Do people normally just add stuff and wait for someone to complain?
> If so, I'll stop posting questions about these little mods, and just
> implement them, and fix em if someone bitches.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
